In response to:

Why Republicans Are Poised To Lose The Second Amendment Battle

Paulus Textor Wrote: Jan 27, 2013 4:01 PM
....For example, in Vietnam, our glorious leaders sent 55 thousand Americans to their deaths, in a war the head Don--Lyndon Johnson--admitted ahead of time could not be won. But he didn't want to have the legacy of being the first American president to lose a war, so in his devil's arithmetic, the cost of 55 thousand lives was worth it. Oh yes. And they did kill, by some estimates 3 to 4 million Vietnamese. You should not fear weapons in the hands of law-abiding citizens. You should take reasonable precautions of arming yourself in case of a home-invasion by crooks. But arms in the hands of government workers should scare the heck out of you.
Jerry555 Wrote: Jan 27, 2013 4:09 PM
They could have ended that war in Vietnam easily, just like Afghanistan, the Liberals are just playing pawns here, the ROE over there is shameful.

You have to give progressives credit. They’re nothing if not thorough. When an opportunity to limit the Second Amendment presented itself in the Sandy Hook massacre, regardless how tasteless it was to exploit that opportunity, they went full bore toward their goal.

Sen. Diane Feinstein, D-Calif., introduced sweeping so-called “assault weapons” ban legislation this week that would place unprecedented restrictions on individuals’ rights to own, use, sell and even pass along already owned firearms to family members. But given where things stand now in the polls and political atmosphere, that legislation will go nowhere.

But the Constitution and the...