In response to:

Strangled by Tight Money

Paulus Textor Wrote: Jun 21, 2012 11:54 AM
I am in favor of a single, worldwide money. It's called "gold."
Blair31 Wrote: Jun 21, 2012 12:35 PM
The problem with gold? If you've watched the Milton Friedman videos in Daniel J. Mitchell's articles, Milton Friedman explains that the Great Depression was made WORSE by a LACK of gold. That's why the dollar was allowed to "float" against other currencies in 1971. We didn't have enough gold in our own
reserves, to cover it.
Paulus Textor Wrote: Jun 21, 2012 6:06 PM
Friedman always was an opponent of gold, which was one of his many weak points (though overall, he was a decent enough defender of free markets).

In the case of the Depression, private ownership of gold was outlawed by Imperial Decree on the part of FDR, in 1933. The quantity of gold at that point was irrelevant.

However, had we stayed on a precious metals standard at that point, and not tried to spend ourselves rich through government alphabet soup programs, we would have been out of the Great Depression in a year. Instead, we floundered along in a depression until, arguably, the late 1940's.
Remember the guy who ran for governor of New York as the candidate of the Rent Is Too Damn High Party? We need a new one, called the Money Is Too Damn Tight Party. It would get my vote.

But the vote it needs belongs to Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke, and he isn't giving it. On Wednesday, the Fed indicated it would stick to its current course, declining to embark on another "quantitative easing" that would inject a lot more money into the economy.

He and many other people have awful memories of high inflation from the late 1970s and early 1980s....

Wednesday, June 19 | 08:12 AM ET
Wednesday, June 19 | 08:12 AM ET
Wednesday, June 19 | 08:12 AM ET
Wednesday, June 19 | 08:12 AM ET