In response to:

7 Political Questions for Republicans Who Support Amnesty

Paul12292 Wrote: Jan 22, 2013 12:22 AM
Mostly a good article, but with these problems: 1. Hawkins wrote, "While immigration is certainly good for America, .." No, on the whole it isn't. Probably never has been. Certainly isn't now. 2. Hawkins wrote, "Moreover, if we have a second "one time" amnesty, why wouldn't we have a third, a fourth, or a fifth?" Actually, we've already had a SEVENTH. See here: So now we're talking about an EIGHTH amnesty.
Kenneth L. Wrote: Jan 22, 2013 9:11 AM
I agree with Falcon. Immigration has been very good for the country. You don't support your non-sequitur statement, so maybe you are talking in a narrow sense (e.g., dilution of "Western" culture), but economically, immigration is good for the U.S. Phyllis Schlafly, among others, is wrong on this issue. It has been proven that immigrants don't steal jobs from America (the union canard), but that they create jobs.
1Falcon1 Wrote: Jan 22, 2013 7:00 AM
Legal immigration has been GREAT for this country you dolt

Republicans who support amnesty are like global warming alarmists. They can't answer the most basic questions about what they believe. Since the Republican Party is now once again considering going to war with itself over amnesty instead of trying to move the ball forward for conservatism, it seems like a good time to ask some of the crucial questions that always seem to be conspicuously ignored because the pro-amnesty side has no answers.

1) How many net votes would the GOP lose if illegal immigrants become citizens? Barack Obama beat Mitt Romney 73% to 27% with Hispanic...