Previous 21 - 30 Next
"You never want a serious crisis to go to waste. And what I mean by that is an opportunity to do things you think you could not do before." - Rahm "Dead Fish" Emanuel Including dancing on the graves of the little innocents in Connecticut, to further the leftist anti-gun dogma?
Ross Perot helped elect Billy Clinton twice. Clinton never garnered more than a plurality of votes in his two elections. Lincoln won his first election due to a third party splitting the Democrat vote. A third party of conservatives would simply guarantee Jackazz Party victories.
In response to:

Bankrupt State University

Patriotic Chicagolander Wrote: Nov 29, 2012 3:26 PM
My sentiments exactly!
"How? One answer is that university personnel almost all share the same liberal-left beliefs. Many feel that contrary views and criticism are evil and should be stamped out." This has been a prevalent view since the 60's. The only difference is that then the stricture on "contrary views" resulted in lowered grades for the contrariarians. Now, liberals seek to expel from campuses anyone with "unacceptable" views.
A larger percentage of Republicans than Democrats voted for the Civil Rights Act of 1964, thanks to the GOP's Everett Dirksen.
"In sum, the GOP's Southern electorate was not rural, nativist, less educated, afraid of change, or concentrated in the most stagnant parts of the Deep South. It was disproportionately suburban, middle-class, educated, younger, non-native-Southern, and concentrated in the growth-points that were, so to speak, the least "Southern" parts of the South. This is a very strange way to reincarnate George Wallace's movement." The Segregationists became Republicans myth busted in greater detail: http://www.claremont.org/publications/crb/id.928/article_detail.asp
"They utilized the poor white vote to win elections." Studies have shown in the South that the poor white vote remained predominantly Democrat The change was due to a vibrant migrating and emerging "native" middle class voting Republican.
If an individual is so used to eating those welfare "cans of beans" for supper, he/she can't comprehend that hard work leads to much better fare.
In response to:

Is Demography Destiny?

Patriotic Chicagolander Wrote: Nov 14, 2012 6:53 PM
First of all, Hispanic is not a "race,." as leftists would have you believe. There are black, brown, and white Hispanics. The use of the ethnic group "Hispanic" as a similie for "brown" is entirely tendentious. Secondly, the figures are not mine, they are from the 2008 U.S. census as cited by Jeff Jacoby, hardly a right winger. Read the article. Links are provided directly to the pertinent census data. Thirdly, Google has a lot of left leaning nonsense, which is hardly scientific in nature.
In response to:

Is Demography Destiny?

Patriotic Chicagolander Wrote: Nov 14, 2012 12:05 PM
Read Sowell's book "Black Rednecks and White Liberals" for the origins of "ebonics." "Ebonics" is essentially southern white "redneck" speech!
In response to:

Is Demography Destiny?

Patriotic Chicagolander Wrote: Nov 14, 2012 11:49 AM
Google vs the 2008 U.S. census!? I'll stick with the census.
Previous 21 - 30 Next