Previous 11 - 20 Next
Meant to say, his choice was tragically misguided.
To those posters below who believe Ann is criticizing this young doctor's choice to serve as a missionary in Africa, she is not! Ann is making the clear statement that his choir was tragically misguided. She is saying that he should not have served "where angels fear to tread." To go to a country with active Ebola was both unwise and reckless, to say the least. Some sincere Christians do indeed act within a narrow doctrinal aspiration, which IS a form of narcissism, whereby they think that God will somehow protect them because they are serving Him. Even Christ-inspired service needs to be pragmatic, especially when the risks are so very great, as Ebola presents. And while this young doctor has the right to choose his place of service, he now puts millions of Americans at risk for that decision. There are so many areas of this world that could have benefited from his medical skills and his passion to serve. And needless to say, serve for decades to come, given his God-inspired altruism. My prayers go to his wife and children, who are the greatest victims of this truly tragic situation.
As always, Mr. Limbaugh, you have presented a coherent and accurate argument. But is the "comeuppance" of the Democrat Party in the upcoming elections the best we can hope for given Obama's egregious lawlessness and destructive policies? It is sad indeed if that is so. Each and every one of our elected officials gave oaths to stand for and uphold the rule of law of the constitution and the Bill of Rights. The Law is the only reason to act or not act. The Democrats as a Party have rejected that rule of law and their oath to uphold it. They have cast aside the Constitution and the covenant it embodies between the American people and God. Our only hope has been that the Republicans would uphold and act righteously in defense of it. They have not. We MUST impeach Obama and not play this Serpent game that he and his Democrats are setting forth in their usual propaganda hit list. Let the chips fall where they may! The Law is our only premise, and not politics. Therefore, impeach Obama! The Law can only protect us if we protect and reverence it.
In response to:

Stop the Coming Obamnesty!

PatriotAfire Wrote: Aug 01, 2014 6:55 PM
In a recent article, Pat, you told us not to impeach Obama. that it would play into the Democrat's end game and sabotage the Republican's edge in the upcoming elections. now you say, "Americans should let Obama know what they think of his amnesty now, before he imposes it upon us." Well, you can't have it both ways. We have elected representatives and the only way to stop Obama IS to impeach him. It is called "doing the right thing." Even Rush has said Obama's lawlessness more than meets the criteria of "High Crimes and Misdemeanors." So are you now for impeachment, Pat, or just safely philosophizing in the rarefied air of academia? Our Founding principles must be protected and defended if our Republic is to survive under these relentless and crushing assaults by this radical statist regime. I am for impeachment.
Great series of posts, traitorbill!
Correct!
Well said, Mr. Limbaugh, with your usual clarity and simplicity. The Constitution and the Rule of Law represent the American people's covenant with God and the unalienable liberties bestowed therein. The founders understood that implicitly. The Democrat Party is unequivocally one with the voice and agenda of Obama. They are a corrupt and soulless entity, who have rejected the compass of the Law, both our nation's laws and God's laws. Once you do that, once you break faith with that covenant of the Law, you have aligned yourself with all that rejects God as the premise--thus, abortion, homosexuality, and all that is the manufactured human willing and wishing outside God's law. Can we roll back Obama's lawlessness? His motive is hate. It will take the love of the American people to be awakened before that hate can be challenged and overcome--a love that bursts with the yearning and profound gratitude for the freedom the founders brought to us by their love. We have to keep tryst with God first and foremost. For God is the premise of our Republic and our liberties. The Democrats, as stated by Saul Alinsky in his Rules for Radicals dedication, prefer to create their own kingdom, in the likeness of the fallen angels. The pride and rebellion of the self is their premise, as it was for Lucifer.
In response to:

Cease the Cease-Fires

PatriotAfire Wrote: Jul 29, 2014 2:03 PM
Speller changed "accountable" to acceptable. Should read, "We have not held Obama and the Democrats accountable."
In response to:

Cease the Cease-Fires

PatriotAfire Wrote: Jul 29, 2014 2:01 PM
To MacQ and Carl265: When a nation's people and her leaders do not challenge lawlessness and especially in the highest office of this land, lawlessness will make its permanent nest in every area of our national life, as it already has because we not have held Obama and the Democrats acceptable. Our founding principles are not negotiable on the political table. WE are here today because the Republicans have continually compromised the constitutional law to politics. And that has gotten us nothing and nowhere. Why? Because it is the game plan of the Democrats. By NOT agitating for and implementing impeachment procedures for Obama's High Crimes and Misdemeanors, we have not and will NEVER stop him. To think impeachment would be giving the Democrats a gift is delusion and cowardice. It is the only righteous and legal weapon we have. Sorry you have bitten into this lie of lying down and letting this administration destroy our nation hour by hour, day by day, without any fight whatsoever from the leadership--or from you. Only truth and the rule of law protects us from the tyranny of this creature in our White House, and his ongoing war against America.
In response to:

Cease the Cease-Fires

PatriotAfire Wrote: Jul 29, 2014 9:39 AM
To Petronia, Sadly, not even Reagan adopted the "you fight to win" policy. He had the capability in the lat 80's to deploy missiles to "end" the Soviet missile build-up for a First Strike against us. He had the classified information in hand of what the Soviets were doing and intended to do. He called only for further research and the long-range SDI technology. He would not take that final step to end the Soviet Union's Strike capability once and for all. The Presidents that followed were even less inclined. And now we have a President who stopped any SDI research and wishes for nothing less than the destruction of this Republic.
Previous 11 - 20 Next