1 - 10 Next
There is no need for snobbery.
Obama has no standing when it comes to talking about economic opportunity when he is pursuing policies that are creating an artificially weak economy.
She is what you call a loving mother!
Will the GOP tell Obama all he has to do is rewrite the regulations if he is sincerely sorry for what he has done?
Why doesn't Obama apologize for all of the changes he has made to the law and rescind the changes?
If he is sorry for lying and the gross incompetence of the Obamacare website roll out, why doesn't he fire those responsible for the website and tell Sebellius to rewrite the regulations that are causing the problem? Perhaps he is not really sorry.
In response to:

Tick... Tick... Tick... Closed

Patrick A Wrote: Oct 01, 2013 11:00 AM
We got here because Obama, Reid and the Democrats are the party of the 1% who give special treatment to corporations and those in political power. They are clearly against the 99%.
Obama, Reid and the Democrats are the party of the 1% who give special treatment to corporations and those in political power. Republicans need to harp on this point.
In response to:

Welcome to the non-government shutdown

Patrick A Wrote: Oct 01, 2013 10:51 AM
Obama, Reid and the Democrats are the 1% against the 99%. They are on record supporting special treatment for corporate elites and those in political power. Every Republican should emphasize those points.
In response to:

Ten Post-Zimmerman Lessons

Patrick A Wrote: Jul 20, 2013 10:40 AM
11. Zimmerman had the legal right to be suspicious of Martin and Martin had the legal right to be suspicious of Zimmerman. 12. Zimmerman had the legal right to follow Martin at night in rainy conditions and Martin had the legal right to circle Zimmerman's car to see who was following him at night in rainy conditions. 13. Zimmerman had the legal right to exit his vehicle and Martin had the legal right to be on his way. 14. Zimmerman had the legal right to be outside in the area and Martin had the legal right to be outside in the area. 15. Zimmerman had the legal right to fear for his life and Martin had the legal right to fear for his life. 16. Zimmerman had no legal duty to retreat and Martin had no legal duty to retreat. 17. Both Zimmerman and Martin had the legal right to use deadly force if they reasonably feared death or great bodily harm. 18. Zimmerman's life would be much different if he had never seen Martin and Martin would be living if he had been staying somewhere else that night. 19. What is legal to do is not always what is best to do.
1 - 10 Next