1 - 10 Next
In response to:

Geithner Goes Over the Edge

Patricia2 Wrote: Apr 28, 2012 12:04 PM
Geithner should have been prosecuted for tax evasion not put incharge of the Treasury of the US of A. It should have been a no brainer - you can't do your own taxes, with or without use of an accountant, without messingup big time so you are not eligible to be Secretary of the Treasury!
Oh so true. They want to tell you how to live but they don't have to live by their on words. It is the old, "Do as I say, not as I do." We really do need that 28th amendment to the Constitution - Congress shall make no law that applies to the people and does not apply to them. Nor shall Congress make any law which applies to them and not the people.
Of course the DFL leader would be this way, afterall, it was a DFL president that pulled back when bin-Laden was in the sites! This was before the 9/11 attacks! This president is just more left-wing liberal than Clinton was. He was pushed into a corner that he couldn't get out of any other way and "save face." Clinton could back off without losing anything, so he did. You are correct in stating a 'logical liberal' is an oxymoron, by the extra heavy on the moron.
The outrage got smothered by the media outlets! Many people don't other to look, listen, read past the "normal" media outlets. Many who do look do not think all the way through to implications. Basically, too many Americans have become apathetic or beleive they can do nothing.
In response to:

An ID to Buy Sugar? But Not For Voting?

Patricia2 Wrote: Feb 05, 2012 1:40 PM
Is this one of those "laws" that gets in as part of something elsejQuery152028989758554845013_1328466841656? Is it part of the "I'll vote for this bill if you put mine into it and we get them both passed," rule of Congressional support? There were taxes and a lot of stuff in the Obamacare nonsense which were passed that have NOTHING to do with healthcard in way what so ever. One such is a tax on selling your house, goes into effect in 2013. The liberal left (usually spelled DFL) thinks it is a wonderful idea, by way of compaign contributions and lobbyists, and therefore we, the people, have to follow the "new" law. Oh, don't think that at least some of the Republicans are immune to the big $$$ associated with this kind of governing!
In response to:

First, They Came for the Catholics

Patricia2 Wrote: Feb 01, 2012 7:10 PM
What ever happened to freedom of religion? The separation of Church and State meant that State could not for religion on to the people. What about the State forcing religion to do the State's bidding - NOT Right! The insurance industry has "bundled" things together to charge people. Why should a everyone have to pay for things that we absolutely don't need of want???? Welcome to Obamacare and Obama's world of self-righteous, narcisistic, self-serving edicts.
In response to:

First, They Came for the Catholics

Patricia2 Wrote: Feb 01, 2012 7:07 PM
The church does not support pills. The Church absolutely does not support the morning after pill. The Natural Family Planning method is the accepted method. The Catholic Church, hospitals, doctors, nurses should not have to go against their conscience. The President was making no compromises. If he continues down this road, he will find a whole lot fewer hospitals, pharmacies, doctors, nurses and other medical professionals. I do not want to pay for someone else's medication of any kind, but especially birth control.
In response to:

Why Should the State License Drivers?

Patricia2 Wrote: Jan 30, 2012 2:50 PM
Driver's License, to get one legally means you are assumed to have a certain level of proficiency at driving. As a part of renewing, in MN anyway, you take a bief eye exam to be sure you can see the signs and distinquish colors and signs to be read. Also, you need photo id to write checks, visit drs, visit dentists to name just a few. Besides, showing a photo id proves that you are a proud citizen of your state in the United States Of America.
In response to:

Why Should the State License Drivers?

Patricia2 Wrote: Jan 30, 2012 2:38 PM
Photo ID to vote depends on what State you live in. MN has no photo id requirement for voting. MN used to have one of the highest confidence percentages in the country.
In response to:

Why Should the State License Drivers?

Patricia2 Wrote: Jan 30, 2012 2:32 PM
I started receiving AARP stuff BEFORE I turned 30. Somebody's database is messed up.
1 - 10 Next