1 - 10 Next
Feminist objectification of the fetus/tissue/child probably contributed to this. As well as sending the message to the males of the populace - you are merely a sperm/financial donor. Whether your prodigy ever takes a breath is up to the females. The children suffer greatly for this.
I'm a working woman, and do not need a pandering government official patronizing for my vote. I understand nothing is free, you pay for it one way or another. But, by all means, "sex it up". It's all you really have. Besides victimhood.
Agreed McGovern. Was merely attempting to answer John. My children were raised very conservation and politically aware. The older never wavered. My younger spent four years at a Jesuit college and declared himself a liberal. He even registered in order to vote for Obama. 8 years after graduation, two huge job promotions (capitalism!) and life experience later, he mocks liberals and has found his way home. While I've always allowed my kids their own path, it was imperative to present the "other side" of the discussion routinely.
Riff - I know a few, thankfully. They are out there. That the college conservative movement is growing by leaps and bounds is an excellent sign. Do not let the MSM discourage you.
Quix - agreed. The ignorance and downright stupidity of the teachers during the Wisconsin "strike" a couple years back scared the heck out of me. Seems they would rather promote parrots than capable educators.
Studies have shown most of anti-abortion, possibly the result of ultrasound technology and the availability of contraception. As for the others, time will tell. Many may support contraception and gay marriage, but also believe them to be personal and not something that others should be forced to accept or finance. Immigration - I would guess they do not want to fight for jobs, so it's believable. Makes sense that many are anti single - parent. Kids growing up without a mom or dad usually wish they had one. Finally, the reason they are rosier about the economy than older generations is that they have no idea what freedoms and opportunities they never had. This all makes sense to me.
In response to:

Setting the Record Straight on SB 1062

Patrice3 Wrote: Feb 26, 2014 6:48 PM
But a sane, objective observer would seriously claim the emotional, visceral, mental and personal anguish that a gay couple feels when the Christian bakery they have targeted refuses to write an message that is anti their faith. Sorry, find another bakery. Your exaggerated faux-offense is only eclipsed by your dismissal of faith as just a "thing". I'm sure the bakery has no problem selling cakes or cupcakes to any paying customer. It's the part about being forced to write a message.
In response to:

Setting the Record Straight on SB 1062

Patrice3 Wrote: Feb 26, 2014 5:32 PM
LongRifle - the Left would never offer up a bill that protects religion. Their intent is to undermine religion (conscience protections, association freedoms, "thought" crimes) and thereby set the groundwork for removing all citizens' First Amendment protections. They could never get the citizenry to give up said rights, but can do it indirectly by setting churches up as the straw man. Look how willfully leftists are to silence any religious based thought - "separation!!!". They are setting their own trap. Useful idiots.
In response to:

Setting the Record Straight on SB 1062

Patrice3 Wrote: Feb 26, 2014 5:13 PM
That should have been addressed to Csmack. Oops.
1 - 10 Next