1 - 10 Next
In response to:

Houston's First Amendment Problem

Patrice13 Wrote: 23 hours ago (12:21 PM)
You'll never know, as the radical left would never pick a fight with them.
In response to:

Please, Janet Yellen, Shut Up

Patrice13 Wrote: Oct 18, 2014 12:10 PM
The other weakness in the proposal is the fallacious assumption that adding layers of lobbyists, bureaucrats and red tape (by moving spending further away from a finger on the pulse) equals better results.
In response to:

Crumbling Constitution

Patrice13 Wrote: Oct 15, 2014 5:12 PM
The Constitution was based on Judeo-Christian principle. What does this mean? Very first lesson in the Bible of Adam and Eve - God did not force them to not eat the apple. God left free will and the results of such, be it reward or consequence. Liberals always want to remove choice from results and force their agenda with coercion. The very antithesis of what our government was predicated on.
In response to:

Inequality Explained

Patrice13 Wrote: Oct 04, 2014 1:19 PM
Equality of outcome rather than equality of opportunity - arguments which agitate emotions rather than inspire intelligent conversation.
Not really. The draft dodgers of the 60s are the ones trying to restrict free speech today. Still leftist, hands out, self-adoring hippies, except now they are in ivory castles.
Great comment.
In response to:

Random Thoughts

Patrice13 Wrote: Sep 30, 2014 12:21 PM
All collectivists!
Societal group unfairness begs for societal government action. Unfair???? Funnel money through Washington.
Hysterical.
1 - 10 Next