In response to:

Caught Red-Handed on Climate Change

Pat2881 Wrote: Jan 21, 2013 12:49 PM
Those who use models usually are more than willing to admit to what it is they do not understand and do not try to use the models beyond their capabilities. As to the data, we use a small subset of data that does not reflect the entire planet and expect that to adequately represent the planet. Anyone with even a small understanding of statistics and research design understands the flaw in that data set. Again, garbage in - garbage out. Given the age of the earth, 150 years of temperature and climate data is insignificant.

A prominent global warming scientist, Peter Gleick, who was chairman of the ethics committee at the American Geophysical Union, admitted last year that he stole some documents- and he may have forged others- from the conservative think-tank the Heartland Institute. But that’s all in a day’s work for a work-a-day climate warrior. The important thing isn’t the quest for the truth in global climate research, but, as Charlie Sheen would say, winning. With winning comes cash.   

Because for some time it’s been clear, that in the climate debate, instead of actually accomplishing something worthwhile, all the attention will be...

Related Tags: Climate Change