In response to:

Obama Lied, Crowley’s Cred Died.

paratisi Wrote: Oct 20, 2012 2:32 PM
Several have mentioned it and I will also continue to ask; How did Obama know Candy CRowley's notes/debate prep, better than she did? How did he know that Candy had a "Transcript" of an obscure speech, that Obama planned to use as cover for his Big Lie, to the American people? How, when and where did Obama & Crowley, cook up this 2 on 1 game of "Gotcha"? See, this is exactly the reason I keep telling Republicans, they have to take on the Enemy media and take away their credibility! Here's a simple & easy concept for taking on the Obama Enemy media & Winning: http://paratisiusa.blogspot.com/2012/09/an-open-letter-to-those-who-should-know.html?spref=tw God Bless America!
Joycey Wrote: Oct 20, 2012 2:58 PM
Commies do not care about credibility, and they never have, and they never will.

Stop looking at them as if they were normal people. They are abnormal zombies.

President Obama’s lie at the debate--that he made an early call the Benghazi attack was terror-- was petty and ludicrous.

It was petty because, as a semantic dispute, it grasped brief advantage that necessarily had to yield to inevitable fact-checking. It was ludicrous because, as a matter of history, it pretended two weeks of vehement, contradictory spin from the administration never happened.

When Mitt Romney challenged Obama on his failure to admit the Benghazi massacre was terrorism, the president threw down a startling gauntlet: He had indeed called the attack an act...