In response to:

Reason for (Cautious) Optimism

Panda Wrote: Aug 27, 2012 9:38 PM
Another meaningless point from a Soros-paid Democrat plant. Silly Winnie. Tricks are for crackwhores. But apparently, you too will do anything--and claim to e anything--for a buck.
Panda Wrote: Aug 27, 2012 9:43 PM
So Winnie, you never got back to me with that proof--you know, the proof for your claim that you recruit equally on pro-Obama sites and anti-Obama sites for Ron Paul?

Awfully simple to prove, Little Marxist. All you need to do is provide a few pre-dated examples of your posts on pro-Obama sites where you recruit people there to vote for Ron Paul because "Obama is just like Romney."

Any time now, Little Marxist. Just show us the proof. Prove you're not just claiming to be a Paul supporter, when we know you're obviously working for Obama.

Yep, still waiting on that proof.
Guy reviewed the WaPo/ABC poll that -- with a D 9 partisan breakdown (larger than the D 7 of 2008) -- showed the race tied.

I'd like to throw out one more reason besides the lopsided sample that's reason for some cautious optimism.  Keep in mind that over the summer, Mitt Romney has basically taken tough punches from the Obama campaign without really fighting back. Soon, he and 527's will begin to spend the money that's been raised, even as Obama's campaign has started spending more than it's taking in, two months in a row.