Previous 0 - 8
In response to:

Expel Brice Horton

Paleo-Con Wrote: Aug 07, 2012 7:17 PM
Your poor grammar and writing techniques make him seem so freaking smart though!
In response to:

Expel Brice Horton

Paleo-Con Wrote: Aug 07, 2012 7:16 PM
Your kidding right? Only a lefty looney toons could even think to offer that public approval ratings mattered. Chick-fil-A had the one day record for sales. Here's another news flash echo-chamber dweller, all those retail clients are conservative... And they will vote in November. By the way, you didn't mean to impune Dr. Adams education level, did you? I would point out that TO ACTUALLY split an infinitive denotes low educational levels to most of the rest of us (read - Conservatives who vote)
Also, since every Christian by definition believes that every human life was planned by the Creator from before the foundation of the world, it would surely anger that Creator if an abortion was committed upon such life for ANY reason!
Except for the reference to the death penalty and abortion under certain circumstances, this is spot on. And for you, "True Conservatives," who'll post replies about the death penalty, I only take issue with the reference as it applies to word Christian in the title. It is inconceivable that Christ would support the death penalty for any reason. I am, sadly, a mere human. I do oppose it generally except when it is a DOUBTLESS certainty the suspect committed the murder, it was particularly heinous and it was certain he would do it again if he were ever free from isolation from any human being including fellow inmates.
In response to:

The War on Unborn Women

Paleo-Con Wrote: May 30, 2012 8:52 AM
They may find only such a reason valid not to kill the unborn child. However, let's face it. PP is in it for the money. Like the Nazis who worked to death or farmed out their victims as slave labor (YUP, I SAID NAZIS!) for profit, at the end of the day, Planned Parenthood kills children for money.
Sociologists, huh. What do the real scientists say?
Apparently most of the actual women at this university care. Amazing! Screw the many for the one. Why not, we've been getting screwed by the One for 3 and a half years now.
I never get tired of that unicorn analogy!
I'm with you on this logic (simple and accurate). There is a larger consideration that may be way down in the posts here. But I have not seen. That is, the question in this case isn't whether or not I'm ok with this jacka$$ going into the restroom where my wife or daughter are present. The real consideration shouldn't be hypothetical at all. Apparently a huge number of actual human females at UAFS do not want this one person to have this singular accomodation. By the way, I never get tired of that unicorn analogy!
Previous 0 - 8