In response to:

Guns and the President

PaddyL Wrote: Jan 24, 2013 1:52 PM
Question for the Judge: Chief Justice John Marshall stated in some of his early pinions that attacking the Constitution is a form of treason. If so, would not several of Obama's, assorted cabinet members, and various members of Congress' initiatives that directly undermine the Constitution amount to impeachable treason? Please explain your answer.
Fuzzy2 Wrote: Jan 24, 2013 4:00 PM
Attaching the Constitution is a breach of their sworn oaths to defend it. They should be thrown out of office and into the street.
Fuzzy2 Wrote: Jan 24, 2013 4:00 PM
"Attacking"

Much worse than attaching. Ha.
Reginald10 Wrote: Jan 24, 2013 3:54 PM
Yes, but the solution is to vote the so-and-so's out. Arrests for treason, on the basis of a political stance, can also be used by Liberals to hurt Conservatives. If there is a "Constitutional Right" to abortion, then objecting to that "right" would also constitute "treason", wouldn't it?
Here is an uncomfortable pop quiz: Who has killed more children, Adam Lanza or Barack Obama? We'll hold off on the answer for a few paragraphs while we look at the state of governmental excess -- including killing -- in America. But you can probably guess the correct answer from the manner in which I have posed the question.

We all know that the sheet anchor of our liberties is the Declaration of Independence. The president himself quoted Thomas Jefferson's most famous line in his inaugural address earlier this week. He recognized that all men and women are created equal and endowed...