In response to:

Twisting the Internal Polling Knife

p18 Wrote: Nov 12, 2012 8:00 PM
Axlerod didn't mention the "ace in the hole": a world-class Chicago-driven electoral fraud machine. Why, Obama was such a great candidate this time, some precincts in Ohio reported over 100% voter turnout, that unsurprisingly, went for him. Now, there's good and then there's 0bama good. And if you believe that, I've got some swampland in Arizona that's yours for a very reasonable price...
Drifter33 Wrote: Nov 12, 2012 8:21 PM
It is always curious when more people vote than are registered...

Bio-metric voter ID, now, or we will see more of this Al Frankenstein stuff.
Drifter33 Wrote: Nov 12, 2012 8:21 PM
It is always curious when more people vote than are registered...

Bio-metric voter ID, now, or we will see more of this Al Frankenstein stuff.

In light of the revelation that Mitt Romney was "shell-shocked" by his loss last week, I've been pretty tough on the job performance of his campaign's internal pollsters, who clearly missed the mark -- resulting in costly tactical decisions down the stretch:
 

These analyses [of the "expand the map" strategy] make sense, but only within the context of the campaign truly believing that they were safe in other crucial must-have states -- a cataclysmically wrong assumption. When I stopped by Romney headquarters in Boston back in September, Newhouse said his team was anticipating a...