In response to:

Obama: The Fetus Is "A Potential Life" But Viability Is A "Moving Target"

p18 Wrote: Oct 03, 2012 11:58 PM
Because of the right to "life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness." Hard to have the last two if the first is taken away! Or maybe government shouldn't protect innocent life? Here's some twisted logic for ya: when a couple wants to keep the child, they call it a baby. When they want to get rid of it, it magically becomes a blob of cells fit only for disposal. Or this one: the same people who'd risk life and limb to protect unborn sea turtles can't do the same for unborn children. Or how about the whole "viability" argument? Guess that leaves out the younger kids and mabye many of the older ones. For that matter, what about adults that can't exist on their own apart from society? Better ramp up Sanger's eugenics program...
p18 Wrote: Oct 04, 2012 12:00 AM
Or how about this one- the same left that claims to care so much about African-Americans encourages abortions that are disproportionately higher in the black community than any other demographic.

Yeah, but the Tea Party has it wrong...

A new video has surfaced and The Brody File has the exclusive of State Senator, Barack Obama back in Sept. 8, 2004, talking about how the human fetus is a “potential life.” (As opposed to an actual life.)

He also goes on to say that the viability of that “potential life” is a “moving target.” He made these comments at a small business event in Springfield, Ill.

I wonder if Barack was unmoved when he "punished" Michelle with a baby because there was, after all, only a "potential life" living inside of her.