He was the first black man to ever be considered for candidacy at a political convention for the office of president of the United States. Back in the 60's that was more an act of protest than an actual consideration, but it makes one wonder what effect that show may have had to enhance Obama's chances.

I would want to see another important amendment...stop the insanity of anchor babies. This policy makes no sense and only serves to increase the complexity of the issue by increasing the human toll in correcting past problems.

Government spending needs a meat axe. If the political process makes it impossible to decide what to cut and what to leave, cut it all equally across the board.

There is nothing wrong with business owners pulling for a political candidate or party of their preference, but it is pure stupidity to do it at the risk of their own business. The only exception would be professional campaign workers where by design they need to be overtly for the party they represent. Business and politics may have close relationships, but for the good of the businesses smart owners adopt a don't ask/don't tell policy.

I believe the film story was an attempt to revive the meme of Fast and Furious...see what happens when you allow angry citizens to carry assault weapons and RPS...

You obviously misread the article that is about voter fraud and election integrity. It isn't about democrat, republican, or libertarian. Its about fraud which should be fully prosecuted regardless of which party is cheating. The point is that unless we can have full confidence in our electoral process, the republic can be seriously damaged.

I doubt that they will drop California again when its time to count votes.

Perhaps the Obama campaign hired 500,000 campaign workers...

I think your on the right track, but I would lean more toward suspending voting rights while accepting unearned government welfare (food stamps, section 8, etc...) as the more direct conflict of interest. Some of the 'untaxed' simply worked to avoid taxable situations while still actively participating in (contributing to) the economy.

I don't believe the issue is rich or poor (subjective terms). The issue is somebody else or me (personal terms). Even if you don't support soaking the rich, you probably aren't all that involved as long as you don't identify yourself as one of the rich. Why should you take responsibility for your life if you can blame somebody else. All our problems have been caused by somebody else...just ask any politician. That somebody else needs to pony up and fix things.