I watched a video of Rick speaking to a white audience in Sioux City, Iowa, the video did not show a question being asked and the quote in this article was after a considerably long sentence so it seems it was not in direct response to a question.

Why do people post a reply that has nothing to do with the article that the replies are to be about? Can't we keep the posts to be about the topic so the topic of discussion will not be lost?

Why do you post a reply that has nothing to do with the article that the replies are to be about?

I would love a right wing evangelical Christian in the White House. Rick Santorum apparently is not the candidate who can get their. I say this after reading what appears to be a quote from Rick Santorum “I don’t want to make black people’s lives better by giving them somebody else’s money; I want to give them the opportunity to go out and earn the money.” Is anybody checking before Rick makes statements like this or is he shooting from the hip. If I were going to make a statement I would not single out a race. I would refer to people receiving assistance as poor. I also would not inadvertently suggest that receiving assistance improves their lives. I would however suggest that it holds them back from making their lives better on thei

Actually if you remember how Gore after questioning Col. Oliver North during Reagan's presidency set it in motion to take bin Laden out. Or was it the Democrats who laughed about Bin Laden. I wonder how many of those Democrats who laughed at Col. Oliver North for suggesting we take Bin Laden out were laughing when the twin towers came down.

Ron Paul, speaks out in favor of pork barrel projects has constantly voted against cutting back on it earmarks that are pork barrel projects. He does not know what is good for America keeping in mind that we are part of a global world. The biggest problems the world has today is terrorism and government spending. Ron Paul is standing on the wrong side of these two problems.

Chuck Norris for President? I think so. From the first half of this article it is obvious that he understands just like Pres. Reagan did what this country needs. He also has the name recognition that would make him a front runner for the presidency. I don't believe that anyone should be kidding that Chuck Norris should be present, it seems he's a knowledgeable, intelligent person that could lead this nation in the right direction. I am definitely for a Chuck Norris for president campaign. He obviously knows more of what this country needs than any of the current Republican candidates.

Alex Wagner "I just think in the grand scheme of the rights that we have" taking away the people's right to defend themselves will enable us, to ensure our grand scheme of the ability to take away all of the peoples rights.

Alex Wagner "I just think in the grand scheme of the rights that we have" I wonder what she means by the grand scheme. I think her grand scheme is people like her being able to control everything that happens in this country. In order for this to happen people who want to control the masses of population know that disarming citizens is mandatory.

Your Former Supporter is shocked that you oppose Obama is message appears to say any black person should support a presidential candidate simply on race. That sounds a little racist to me.