In response to:

Attack of the Concern Trolls

OBAMA-DRAMA Wrote: Feb 17, 2013 3:07 PM
During Clinton's second term further tax increases were not necessitated due to the tax windfall derived from the IPO scam that was ongoing from 1996-200... ending as Bush entered office. It was Carter that implemented the Community Reinvestment Act and Clinton that repealed Glass-Steagall. These two events is what led to the housing pricing bubble that collapsed in late 2008 which nearly sent this nation into a second Depression. Had such occurred a second Civil War was likely that would be raging to this day. This nation's finest presidents are Lincoln, Reagan, Washington, Bush II, Roosevelt and Truman. Other than Lincoln none existed in the 19th century.
sbemis Wrote: Feb 18, 2013 2:30 AM
yes,i don't think they fit either.I wish to God that JFK"s younger brother,Bobby had been president.The country would be so much better now.I"m sure.
sbemis Wrote: Feb 18, 2013 2:27 AM
where in hell do you get your history from? But neither Lincoln nor Washington were part of this area,Reagan,Bush11 were and are a don't mention which Roosevelt but either tops these clowns.There hasn't been a decent REp president since Ike.I"m rather partial to Mr.Jefferson.
Younger Wrote: Feb 17, 2013 6:28 PM
Franklin Roosevelt prolonged the Recession with his ideas of government intervention with the economy. During the financial troubles in the twenties, the government did nothing--and the economy recovered quickly.FDR meddled, and the troubles increased dramatically.
OBAMA-DRAMA Wrote: Feb 17, 2013 3:15 PM
For what reasons do you deem them unworthy of being on my list ?
LouLouise Wrote: Feb 17, 2013 3:11 PM
You can take Lincoln and Roosevelt off your list.

Turns out the New York Times is worried about the future of the Republican Party. So concerned, in fact, it has dedicated more than 6,000 words in this week’s magazine to explore, as the title puts it, “Can The Republicans Be Saved From Obsolescence?” Indeed, the folks at The Times seem extremely concerned that which they hate might not survive. And by “concerned” I mean they’re hoping.

That The Times would seek to harm Republicans, and more specifically conservatives, is about as shocking as Piers Morgan doing a special episode on the need for gun control. But that so...