It must be nice to sit on the sideline, pontificating, criticizing and evaluating the doers and the most noble among us. This guy is just another wimp who has never been in a fight in his life and thinks that freedom is his right to live just above a government safety net that spoon-feeds him right to mediocrity along with everyone else. He's completely forgotten the meaning of manhood and honor. This is the exact reason I can't watch MSNBC. What a little puke

I believe that Mr. Hunter is missing an important point. All of the general election polls consistently indicate that Governor Romney is the only Republican with a realistic chance to beat President Obama. It doesn't matter which candidate he prefers if the man can't win. I have some reservations about Romney, but I believe he is the best of the remaining GOP candidates and would be a vast improvement over Obama. I for one will be glad when the nomination is locked up and we can all get behind him.

I seem to be in the minority here, but I absolute agree with Ann's assessment. Mitt Romney is by far the best chance for conservatives to have a representative in the White House. Mitt is also the best chance to elect someone who understands the economy well enough to turn things around. I understand the reservations some conservatives have about Mitt, but I'm convinced he's the only man left in the GOP race with any chance of actually winning the general election and he would be a massive improvement over Obama. Please people, try to see the big picture.

Sorry, but I'm not buying Newt's well-planned self-righteous rant. All he did was turn the focus away from himself and onto the topic of Republican's being unfairly handled by the media(good debating tactic, but disingenuous). I'm amazed that everyone seems to be buying it. The truth is, Newt is a serial womanizer. He's on his third wife and cheated on the first 2. I have the same problem with him that I did with Bill Clinton: If a man cannot keep a sacred promise made to his wife, why should anyone ever think he can be trusted? We also need to understand that this isn't a matter of a one-time indiscretion, which would be easy to dismiss, this is a history of placing his own "needs" over keeping his word and doing what he knows is right.