In response to:

Could Ronald Reagan Get Elected Today?

nutterup Wrote: Nov 09, 2012 1:43 PM
And the US taxpayer is still BAILING out the VICTIMS 25 years later. Reagan whole-heartedly and cold heartedly believed in the Marxist redistribution of wealth from America's east and west coasts to America's heartland. And now, in the year 2012, with farm subsidy handouts and ethanol mandates peaking at $35 billion a year, are we any closer to a free market in agriculture? Again, why does the vast majority of these farm handouts go to people who are card-carrying members of the Republican Party?
1375 Wrote: Nov 09, 2012 9:01 PM
At least farmers produce something that has value! Unlike Solyndra Boy et al..
upwithRomney Wrote: Nov 09, 2012 2:20 PM
This is what I mean. Reagan wouldnt survive as a politician today.

Popular theory suggests Reagan was too moderate for today’s GOP, but the experts disagree.


From Townhall Magazine's November Perspectives by Kyle Bonnell:

Questioning Ronald Reagan’s electability in today’s political environment has become a preoccupation of today’s liberals. As this story goes, Ronald Reagan was too moderate and compromising for the tea party-infested, intransigent and ideologically rigid Republican Party. But is it true?

Not according to Edwin Meese, President Reagan’s Attorney General.

“If you look at his...

Related Tags: Tea Party Ronald Reagan