In response to:

The Stretch Run

Northern Patriot Wrote: Nov 01, 2012 1:29 PM
Don't jump the gun on the election: 1) Obama leading in several swing states as per latest polls. 2) Could this picture and story doom Romney: An Unlikely Political Pair, United by a Disaster; http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/01/us/politics/obama-tours-storm-ravaged-new-jersey-with-gov-chris-christie.html?_r=0&adxnnl=1&ref=todayspaper&adxnnlx=1351789471-AA7Mx6uzpMEDgFcOrxH73Q 3) C'mon Mitt, Privatizing Disaster Relief Would be a Disaster; http://open.salon.com/blog/steven_j_gulitti/2012/10/31/cmon_mitt_privatizing_disaster_relief_would_be_a_disaster
Anonymous11565 Wrote: Nov 01, 2012 7:05 PM
Romney said he's place the duties of FEMA at the state level. Not sure what's so wrong with that, but it sure gives liberals an opportunity to lie about Romney's statements.
Since obama and clinton as senators voted against funding help for katrina, house republicans should follow their lead and say NAY to helping the liberals of NJ and NY.
Illbay Wrote: Nov 01, 2012 6:16 PM
1) No examples given, I see.

2) NO ONE pays attention to the NYT anymore. Not even the NYT.

3) Salon.com? SALON.COM?
The Teleprompter Speaks Wrote: Nov 01, 2012 2:12 PM
Mitt never, ever said he wanted to privatize disaster relief.

All you guys got are lies and distortions. Why aren't you running on the Obama record?
Northern Patriot Wrote: Nov 01, 2012 4:48 PM
Hey "Teleprompter" instead of jumping to conclusions why don't you try reading the referenced source: C'mon Mitt, Privatizing Disaster Relief Would be a Disaster; http://open.salon.com/blog/steven_j_gulitti/2012/10/31/cmon_mitt_privatizing_disaster_relief_would_be_a_disaster
Illbay Wrote: Nov 01, 2012 6:18 PM
The states are where disaster relief belongs.

And the states don't get s**t done. It's all done by the private sector anyway.

You're problem of course, is that you want "CZARS" in charge of s**t, because you want to know that you can get some handout or other. If it had to be earned by DOING you'd be s**t out of luck.
Nunya8 Wrote: Nov 01, 2012 8:15 PM
OH NP...you and them pesky facts again...

Sour Patch kids in their Koolaid...
restoreliberty Wrote: Nov 01, 2012 9:13 PM
If those funds were confiscated from the states and the people in the first place they wouldn't have beg back from federal government that which they should never have taken in the first place.
restoreliberty Wrote: Nov 01, 2012 9:14 PM
were = weren't .....sorry typo
You want good news about the election? Start with Rove.

You want to scare yourself even though Halloween is over? Read Sons of Cincinnatus.

Nate Silver predicts that there is a 87.342% chance you will read both because people following this election read everything.

The misery in New York and New Jersey is a backdrop that is definitely impacting the election, but not in the way the president's partisans hope. People are suffering as they have suffered for four years under his various...