1 - 10 Next
In response to:

Michigan: Mitt Romney's Waterloo?

Norma R Wrote: Feb 18, 2012 8:23 AM
Too bad if it turns out so. Rick is nice, but a kind of nothing candidate. Too associated with his social causes, without the presence that Romney has. My advice, look for property abroad and relocate as of November 2012, or you may be stuck in the People's Republic of America.
In response to:

No More Moonbeam Presidents

Norma R Wrote: Feb 17, 2012 6:37 AM
I can support Santorum (not so gingrich) but I'm afraid he really lacks charisma. I've met the man, perfectly decent, intelligent guy, but his earnestness is almost suffocating. I'm afraid he would be less effective than Romney against Obama, for various reasons. This race is really sad. Sure wish Mitch Daniels (or even Marco Rubio) would end up as a brokered nominee.
I understand legal challenges are in the works. This is excellent. They should demand expedited consideration. Let's get it to the Supreme Court for clarification and ruling.
This entire theme -- erosion of fundamental personal liberties in the US -- is coming to the fore now. I offer three words: Million Christian March. We need to take on the Obama Administration mano a mano, face to face, to demand an end to persecution of Christians in America and the imposition of legal punishments for such acts of hatred and malice through special legislation to empower and protect the Christian majority of this country.
In response to:

Target: Michigan

Norma R Wrote: Feb 14, 2012 4:24 PM
we better coalesce around one candidate and soon, because if we don't we are going to lose it all in November.
In response to:

On to Tehran -- or Is It Damascus?

Norma R Wrote: Feb 14, 2012 7:05 AM
Could not agree more. I sure wish there were an actual anti-war movement by the Republicans, that is where we could score points.
In response to:

White House attacks contraception bills

Norma R Wrote: Feb 14, 2012 6:51 AM
Is anybody out there listening to this growing chorus of anger? I have communicated with a bunch of conservative talk show hosts to recommend a million Christian march to protest the violation of religious freedom and theofficial encouragement of hate and malice toward the practice of Christianity. Nobody has responded. Doesn't it make sense that the largest group of all, Christians, should stand up and say "no more" and demand legislation to protect the practice of Christianity.
In response to:

White House attacks contraception bills

Norma R Wrote: Feb 14, 2012 6:46 AM
And they say Republicans are tone deaf? These Marxists are starting to actually believe their own propaganda. Yes, sure, the whole country is clamoring for infringement of religious liberty if you listent to them. This is the tip of the wedge for November and the GOP needs to take heed and shape their campaign around the infringements of liberty this group of lunatics has already committed and what lies ahead, as well as what the Republican alternative is. Now or never.
In response to:

Gingrich, Romney and the "Passion Gap"

Norma R Wrote: Feb 01, 2012 11:24 AM
Obviously, you didn't have the Florida results yet...but Newt's vaunted strength among women has disappeared. I think SC reacted emotionally but reality has settled in. Nobody really wants wacky Newt at the helm, but they don't mind giving the left-stream media (my preferred name) what-for. Newt is crazy, and crazy can be infectious. We need to be mindful of that, because in November it is us asking the whole country to vote for our Party. Not just one committed wing of one party.
Is anybody else getting tired of Sarah and her clan? Just another celebrity.
1 - 10 Next