In response to:

Jesse Jackson was Right

NormanH Wrote: Jan 26, 2013 1:52 AM
Millions of lives are aborted every month when the female egg does not get nine months of development in the female womb, painful delivery from the female womb at the risk of death (my mother's mother died delivering my mother) and commitment to care for the delivered baby. Oh, MOST IMPORTANTLY, fertilization of the female egg by the MALE SPERM. Conception by the MALE SPERM aborts free choice by the female to pursue something other than motherhood. If the male and female roles were reversed there would be no question that free choice would prevail.
Patrice3 Wrote: Jan 26, 2013 6:51 AM
There is nothing natural about a third party dismembering and suctioning a child out of the mother's womb. The male sperm cannot create a child by itself any more that the female egg can. Both play equal roles, most often in a mutually consensual encounter.
If the roles were reversed, you can bet woman would be demanding a choice over decisions concerning their unborn children.
Earl29 Wrote: Jan 26, 2013 8:17 AM
Well said, Patrice.
There is a difference between falling out of a window and being pushed.

This week marked the 40th anniversary of Roe v. Wade, and since state-sanctioned slaughter via judicial fiat began at least 50 million Americans have been killed. Over the last 40 years there have been some eloquent attempts to win the defining moral argument of our age, but few have come close to being as effective as the one I’m sharing with you today.

And it was written by Jesse Jackson. Yes, that Jesse Jackson.

To commemorate the 4th anniversary of Roe v. Wade in 1977, Jackson wrote an editorial titled How We Respect Life is the Over-Riding Moral Issue. What’s...