In response to:

The Geopolitics of Immigration

None1257 Wrote: Dec 26, 2012 12:14 PM
What would happen to the number of people crossing our southern border illegally, if we made one simple change to our legal immigration policy? What would happen if instead of picking winners and losers, we adopted a first to apply is the first to enter, with obvious exceptions? How consistent are conservatives when they complain about "social engineering", when they support social engineering, when they support picking who can enter this country legally and who cannot?
Anominus Wrote: Dec 26, 2012 12:41 PM
"a first to apply is the first to enter, with obvious exceptions"

This already is our immigration policy.

The United States came into being through mass movements of populations. The movements came in waves from all over the world and, depending upon the historical moment, they served differing purposes, but there were two constants. First, each wave served an indispensable economic, political, military or social function. The United States -- as a nation and regime -- would not have evolved as it did without them. Second, each wave of immigrants was viewed ambiguously by those who were already in-country. Depending upon the time or place, some saw the new immigrants as an indispensable boon; others saw them as a...