In response to:

It Takes a Village to Destroy One Thousand Years of Culture

None1257 Wrote: Nov 06, 2012 1:51 PM
Which party is associated with the environmental movement? Which party do you think of when I say, they care more for the less fortunate, than the other party? Can you chew and swallow at the same time? Can you be in favor of what the environment movement wants and still be concerned about the less fortunate in this country? Or are they completely incompatible?
Sheli Wrote: Nov 06, 2012 3:54 PM
The Wildlife Federation received funding when both parties were in the White House.
There is no excuse for the waste of taxpayer dollars. I have donated to WWF for years. No more cute little stamps on my mail.

If you were looking for that last-minute pre-poll pitch to that favorite undecided voter in your life, you are done shopping. If any fence sitters needed convincing that the liberal agenda is costly, and hypocritical, let them feast their eyes on the following.

David Williams of the Taxpayers Protection Alliance has uncovered a history of abuse of your tax dollars to fund “environmentally responsible” projects across the globe that have done little but fatten wallets and in at lest one case has resulted in the destruction of a village. The TPA is calling it “The Environmental Shakedown of American...