In response to:

Feinstein: Nah, You Don't Need an AR-15 if a Bombing Terrorist is Roaming Your Neighborhood

None1257 Wrote: Apr 23, 2013 11:19 AM
Did some of the police who surrounded the guy have fully automatic rifles? According to Feinstein they did not need them did they?
justme16 Wrote: Apr 24, 2013 9:27 AM
According to Feinstein it is ONLY us lowly citizens who should not have them. They don't want their police, or their armed guards or the new brown boots hiding within the IRS and DHS to be out gunned.
They don't want anything in our hands that might be used in an eventual revolution should "we the people" the true patriots finally get to the point that their passive aggressive dictatorial nonsense needs to be curtailed.

Last week when Boston bombing suspect Dzhokhar Tsarnaev was running from police through neighborhoods where families live, I tweeted the following:

 photo Screenshot2013-04-22at34053PM_zps2141ee66.png

Apparently, I was wrong. Over the weekend on Fox News Sunday, Senator Dianne Feinstein argued people don't "need" an "assault rifle" if a bombing terrorist is running around in their neighborhood. From Real Clear Politics(you can watch the video