In response to:

Moving Forward Doesn’t Mean Funding Planned Parenthood for President Obama’s Daughters

ninib58 Wrote: Aug 04, 2012 7:40 PM
As a matter of fact, that's not so far fetched -read about the age cut-off for cancer treatment in the "ruled constitutional by the Supreme Court" Health Care Reform Act, as it states that after a person manages to live to the ripe old age of 76 (I'm pretty sure I got that exact age correct), they will be denied care, other than palliative, and it will be rationed to the younger. Nice, huh? There's lots more, too -you should read it! I doubt the Supreme Court read much, if any. Oh -that's right -a member admitted that many briefs were not -but that others were trusted to share any important points! What a laugh that is! :)

Editor's note: This column was authored by Catherine Glenn Foster, Litigation Counsel for the Alliance Defending Freedom.

It seems that every day the effects of the culture of death on our society are more and more obvious, and more and more gruesome. Just take the continued funding of Planned Parenthood with taxpayer dollars.

This ongoing controversy was highlighted recently when President Barack Obama declared yet again that he wants to continue pumping our hard-earned money into Planned Parenthood. Why? So it will still be around to perform abortions for daughters if they want one.

He drew a contrast...