In response to:

Nate Silver's Numbers Racket

nimh1 Wrote: Nov 07, 2012 6:32 AM

Add to that, the "prior knowledge" that the Israelis (mossad) had of 9-11. They were observed videotaping the "event" . . . when asked about their activities, they replied that the muslims were "our problem now". A few days later, a bunch of Israeli (mossad) agents (disguised as "art students")were spirited out of the USA on "national security" grounds. In addition, a Israeli-owned "moving company' (mossad) owner and employees left the USA for Israeli. The "dancing Israelis" later appeared on Israeli talk shows . . . This was reported on right after 9-11, Google "dancing Israelis" for more information. IF it were ever found out that there was Israeli complicity in 9-11, Israel should cease to exist . . .

Join the Debate!

All comments and users are subject to Townhall's new comments policy.

Read Full Story

Nate Silver's Numbers Racket

In the last week or so, an intense kerfuffle broke out over the poll-prognosticator Nate Silver and his blog at the New York Times, FiveThirtyEight. Silver, a statistician, has been predicting a decisive Obama victory for a very long time, based on his very complicated statistical model, which very, very few of his fans or detractors understand.

On any given day, Silver might have announced that -- given the new polling data -- "the model" was now finding that the president had an 86.3 percent chance of winning. Not 86.4 percent, you fools. Not 86.1 percent, you Philistines. But 86.3 percent,...

Related Tags: The New York Times Polls Bias Nate Silver