In response to:

Pro-Life Conservatives Divided over Condoleeza Rice

NewAgeOfReason Wrote: Jul 13, 2012 10:49 PM
I assume that you: don't cut your hair or shave (Leviticus 19:27) don't wear clothing of more than one fabric (Leviticus 19:19) don't support farmers having more than one crop in the field (Leviticus 19:19) believe that People who have flat noses, or is blind or lame, cannot go to an altar of God (Leviticus 21:17-18) will Kill anyone with a different religion. (Deuteronomy 17:2-7) If you find out a city worships a different god, destroy the city and kill all of it's inhabitants... even the animals. (Deuteronomy 13:12-15) Any person who curseth his mother or father, must be killed. (Leviticus 20:9) You don't eat shellfish or pork either. Or do you just pick and choose the things you follow in the bible?
abernard Wrote: Jul 13, 2012 10:52 PM
Please NAR this ...person picks and chooses and changes the wording to fit it's needs.

Reason number one Romney shouldn’t – and honestly, won’t – pick Condoleeza Rice? Reactions like this. Marjorie Dannenfelser, president of pro-life advocacy group Susan B. Anthony List, expressed strong disappointment in the rumor that Romney has Condi under consideration, issuing this statement via email:

Former Secretary Rice's position on the sanctity of human life makes her an unqualified candidate for Governor Romney to choose as a running mate. Throughout the campaign, including at the Palmetto Freedom Forum last September, he has pledged to us in no uncertain terms that he would choose a pro-life running mate. We have...