In response to:

Piers Morgan Wants to Amend Moses

Nevirim Wrote: Dec 28, 2012 9:50 AM
S.A. wrote correctly by pointing out David, how about Rahab, the prostitute who appears in Messiah's line. Let's take your position one step farther! You bring up "sexual sin as a disqualified for Messiah's line, and imply that sexual perfection from generation to generation was needed, what about other sins? For Messiah to be King he came through two lines, Nathan through David, and Solomon through David. Are you telling me that the line of Solomon was "pure sexually?" Messiah was Pure and Holy without sin or any passed impurities for any of his "relatives through Joseph or Mary. He came in "like manner of "Sinful Man" for which all of His genealogies were "tainted with sin." So here's another passage: James 2:10

Fresh off his attack on America’s gun control laws, Piers Morgan set his sights on another set of laws that trouble him, the laws of Moses and the Bible. But before he called for an amendment to the Bible to recognize “gay rights,” Morgan actually asked his guest, Pastor Rick Warren, a very fair question, and Warren stumbled in his answer.

Of course, Morgan’s timing could not have been worse. After all, this was a Christmas Eve interview with a Christian leader, and Morgan is not exactly riding a wave of popularity. And to compare the Bible to the Constitution shows...