1 - 9
Whoa-! Your pie chart doesn't add up. Where does the missing 18% fall..?
Yeah, speaking of clowns...., look who we have now. : o
Statutorily setting a value on a physical phenomenea is of course futile. Still, the skill with which the author manipulated the language of the article so closely resembled the arrogance of both Big Gov't and the New Lefty Leftists that it took reading nearly to the end to categorically place this as Onion Worthy. Well done. : )
That got me thinking about concealed carry for an Abrams. Hmmm... Oops, sorry, RG. I hit Flag instead of post. If I see a tank outside of my house, I'll assume that it's you...
That got me thinking about concealed carry for an Abrams. Hmmm...
That got me thinking about concealed carry for an Abrams. Hmmm...
I dunno. Might wanna ask SCOTUS, as they recently confirmed the right, as written. Could also, y'know, peruse the wrtings of the founders, who viewed armed civilians as a bulwark against tryanny. But we'd NEVER go that direction, huh..??!?
Soledad is one of those elitists who are so confident in the superiority of their position that to hold a contrarian view is to be de facto wrong. This keeps her from even acknowledging the possibility of a differing view, much less that she might be (aghast-!) wrong. And since that is, by definition doncha know, impossible, the only explanation is that YOU'RE wrong. There, paradox solved. Whew-!
Soledad is one of those elitists who are so confident in the superiority of their position that to hold a contrarian view is to be de facto wrong. This keeps her from even acknowledging the possibility of a differing view, much less that she might be (aghast-!) wrong. And since that is, by definition doncha know, impossible, the only explanation is that YOU'RE wrong. There, paradox solved. Whew-!
1 - 9