In response to:
people expect the Treaty not to go into effect unless it's ratified in the US Senate, and that it will be defeated entirely there ASAP, after it's signed by H-Clinton, B-Obama !
But legally Obama is not under any obligation to submit the Treaty for ratification, he can hold onto it as long as he wants to !
Since Ratification is actually 2ndary to becoming a "Signatory to the Treaty." and because becoming a "Signatory" carries its own obligations,
Which requires the US to participate in the "Treaty,"
Under the "Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties."
That is, we are legally obligated to do nothing to counter or otherwise interfere with this Treaty,
While ratification is being considered, regardless how unlikely the prospect of
Regular readers may recall my tangle on MSNBC's "The Ed Show" back in June, which featured a spirited 3-on-1 political throwdown. Round two came last night, as I joined guest host Michael Eric Dyson, "political comedian" John Fugelsang, and in-house political analyst Jimmy Williams for a conversation about President Obama's "you didn't build that" comments. The discussion rapidly degenerated into a fevered stew of "racist dogwhistles" and Nazi comparisons. Here's the video -- two segments -- with additional commentary to follow:
Therefore, by simply being a "Signatory," the Obama/Hillary anti-gun, anti-2nd-Amdt position threatens our USC right to possess firearms for hunting or self-defense,
Without appearing to be antagonistic to the US-Constitution to the average American !
It seems that there would-should be a US-law-rule, a maximum amount of time that a US-President can hold onto a "Signed-Treaty"
if the US-Congress tells him that they're ready to debate, vote to ratify or not ratify the "Treaty" !
A Sneaky Way To Control Guns A UN Treaty Could Curtail Our Rights - John Bolton - nydailynews.com/opinion/a-sneaky-control-guns-article-1.1116335
Obama’s Back-Door Gun Control - D-Hagmann
homelandsecurityus.com/archives/6317