1 - 10 Next
TH must be on the Rick Perry bandwagon, this is the second article on his candidacy today. The geek glasses and dumping of the cowboy boots are an attempt to shed the hick status. It'll never work as the video of his disastrous performance in a 2012 debate is on Youtube for everyone to peruse. The "oops" ending will forever brand him as a dunce.
Rick Perry has an uphill battle to be president. The geek glasses and dumping of the cowboy boots is an attempt to change his image. The insurmountable problem, however, is the video of his flubbed debate performance where he forgot the name of the third government agency he would eliminate. The Youtube video of his "oops" will haunt him forever and maintain the impression of a dunce.
Chris Christie is one of the few Republicans capable of beating Hillary in 2016. It's not gonna happen for two reasons. First, Christie self-imploded on the GW bridge affair and second, the wingnuts aren't going to nominate him. They will instead cast their votes for the likes of Ted Cruz, Rick Perry etc.
Bush/Cheney and Iraq???
This whole fiasco is nothing but red meat thrown to the Obama haters. Before the Obama administration issued any Executive Order, you can bet your bottom dollar it was cleared through the Justice Dept. Now, it is possible that a court may disagree with those opinions, but very doubtful. All this will really do is to motivate Democratic voters for the 2014 election and disgust the truly independent voters to vote against the Republican party.
Rick Perry has three major points to discuss-Oh Damn, what was that last one? Oops...
By low information voters, I'm sure you are referring to Fox News viewers. http://www.slate.com/blogs/business_insider/2014/01/30/does_watching_fox_news_make_you_less_informed.html
Given that Real Clear Politics polls have Hillary Clinton beating any and all Republican candidates, it will be the mission of Fox News and the rest of the conservative media to trash her at any and every opportunity. RCP results here: http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/latest_polls/president/
What's to stop any voter from changing his/her party affiliation? Cannot a R decide he would rather be a D or vice-versa? Are you the voter party police who will decide what party any given voter can align himself with? How about the true independent who decides that his political leanings are more closely aligned with one party for one election and the other party for the next? My earlier post called this entire affair a fool's errand and your suggestions are even more so.
Seems like a fool's errand to me. Even if the McDaniel campaign finds the 3300 "questionable voters", how is he going to prove who they voted for? Short of rounding them all up, putting them under oath and questioning them as to who they voted for, how is anything to be proven (and that's not counting the illegality of something like that)? McDaniel lost, Cochran won and that's going to be the end of it.
1 - 10 Next