In response to:

Is Chris Christie Overreacting Over the NRA’s “Reprehensible” Ad?

NeighborOfTheBeast Wrote: Jan 18, 2013 6:34 PM
I used to think Christie stood for something. Now, I realize he's just standing in line with his hand out looking for more "Obama money". Maybe he got a free Obama phone so he has a direct line to his new bff. Hey, Bossman---how about focusing a little of that temper on the Dems who loaded up the FEMA bill with so much pork that the Repubs couldn't possibly vote for it?
NeighborOfTheBeast Wrote: Jan 18, 2013 6:39 PM
...or how about showing equal anger over a President who uses other peoples' children as props??

New Jersey Governor Chris Christie is apparently up in arms because the National Rifle Association released an ad asking simple yet important question: If President Obama’s kids are protected by professional armed guards -- why can’t yours be, too?

I agree with the governor on a number of substantive points, but here are two things to consider:

1. The NRA -- at no point during their advertisement -- explicitly attacked Sasha and Malia Obama by name. Yes, they imply that the “president’s children” -- because of who they are -- have certain...