1 - 10 Next
The Democrat side passed the Employer Mandate. You'd think they'd want it enforced!
In response to:

DOW at 17,000 -- But You're Not Invited

NCLaw441 Wrote: Jul 10, 2014 3:28 PM
Did you include your employer's portion as well? If your employer did not have to pay into SS that money would have gone to you as salary.
In response to:

DOW at 17,000 -- But You're Not Invited

NCLaw441 Wrote: Jul 10, 2014 3:25 PM
The promise of SS payments is not "implied" as you state. Every year or so you get a statement from Social Security showing how much you've paid in over the years and telling you your estimated benefits.
In response to:

DOW at 17,000 -- But You're Not Invited

NCLaw441 Wrote: Jul 10, 2014 3:23 PM
It does help if you have a boat, but many choose cell phones with expensive data plans, too expensive homes, vacations, high-priced cars, etc. Nothing left for a "boat." Nothing left for retirement, either....
In the strictest sense, abortion IS birth control, because it prevents birth. I don't support abortion, but it is a form of birth control. What it is NOT is contraception.
In response to:

Slavery Reparations

NCLaw441 Wrote: Jun 18, 2014 8:41 AM
Dr. Williams, yet another issue is that among taxpayers are included millions of blacks, such that they appear to support taxing themselves to pay reparations....
In response to:

Random Thoughts

NCLaw441 Wrote: May 27, 2014 1:33 PM
Eric, it looks like he used it only as a descriptor, not as a relevant factor of any kind. The man IS black, you know. President Bush is a Texan. To describe him as such is not an insult (or a compliment).
In response to:

Random Thoughts

NCLaw441 Wrote: May 27, 2014 1:30 PM
Marriage is more a status than a contract. There are no legal obligations in a marriage. You cannot demand sex, for example, or that one spouse do the housework, or bear a child.
In response to:

Random Thoughts

NCLaw441 Wrote: May 27, 2014 1:28 PM
Bigamy is not necessarily fraud. You could tell your existing wife that you plan to marry again, while still married to her. That isn't fraud. You call it fraud and that makes it discriminatory, under the rules you have devised. By what logic would you keep three people from getting married together? Or 4? By what logic (if you propose to allow same sex marriage) would you prohibit two brothers or two sisters, or a mother and daughter, from getting married?
Soon (if it has not already occurred) there will be a lawsuit claiming that having to wait 30 years for execution is cruel and unusual punishment, and people like Irick will have to be released. Just wait.
1 - 10 Next