In response to:

Same-Sex Marriage Needs Voters' Stamp

naysayer Wrote: Mar 07, 2013 12:13 PM
How can anyone not see the difference between heterosexual and homosexual marriage? As far as I'm concerned homosexuals can only be granted the right to call their unions marriage, but it'll never be a real one in my opinion. What society has deemed legitimate has not always been morally right, and that's a historical fact. Gay "marriage" is joke and you don't have to have much of a sense of humor to find it funny.
Cambermeister Wrote: Mar 07, 2013 12:15 PM
Would homosexuals still covet the label of 'marriage'?
naysayer Wrote: Mar 07, 2013 12:23 PM
Oh no. They'll shift their needs according to the "hetero-sexist" norms.
Cambermeister Wrote: Mar 07, 2013 1:06 PM
Do folks with homosexuality believe a straight label will cure them?
Cambermeister Wrote: Mar 07, 2013 12:14 PM
What if heteros had created a different term for committment?
Beethovens10th Wrote: Mar 07, 2013 12:16 PM
As long as heteros don't have to pretend along with the sodoms.
naysayer Wrote: Mar 07, 2013 12:16 PM
I'm sure it'll be just as laughable.

As a conservative with gay friends, nothing would make me happier than to watch Californians pass an initiative to legalize same-sex marriage -- preferably with protections for religious objectors. Polls suggest it would pass today. Then the issue would be settled, and Californians -- not a court in Washington -- would have determined their own marriage laws.

So of course I was interested when 100-plus conservatives filed a friend-of-the-court brief in support of a legal challenge to Proposition 8, the California constitutional amendment supported by 52 percent of voters in 2008 that limited marriage to a man and a...