In response to:

What's Wrong with Public Nudity?

nawlins72 Wrote: Dec 04, 2012 6:50 PM
Moonbat wrote: "Your freedom to go nude ends with my eyeballs." Uhhh no. This is not a compelling justification for restricting the actions of others. What other freedoms would have to comply with your eyeballs? What about your ears? Something has to actually harm you, not merely offend you, to be justifiably prohibited.
Barbara1247 Wrote: Dec 05, 2012 3:55 PM
Good response nawlins. I don't particularly want to see people nude in public, but I don't believe that I have the right to prevent them. If we didn't make such a fuss about it, I think most people would be happy to restrict their nudity to private establishments and possibly beaches. After all, nudity is not neccessarily very comfortable. Most of us are happy to wear garments that protect us from heat and cold. And of course, private businesses (and individuals) should be able to impose whatever (un)dress-code they please on their property.
If you want to understand Leftism -- and everyone needs to because it has been the most dynamic religion of the last one hundred years -- one good place to start is with San Francisco.

Or perhaps more precisely -- with nudity.

And even more precisely -- with public nudity.

Last month, the San Francisco Board of Supervisors voted by the barest (pun not intended) margin -- 6 to 5 -- to ban public nudity. By public nudity, the law refers only to displaying one's genitals in public. San Francisco women are still free to walk around topless. But that is not unique...

Related Tags: San Francisco Nudity
Thursday, May 23 | 09:00 PM ET
Thursday, May 23 | 09:00 PM ET
Thursday, May 23 | 09:00 PM ET
Thursday, May 23 | 09:00 PM ET