In response to:

What's Wrong with Public Nudity?

nawlins72 Wrote: Dec 04, 2012 6:09 PM
"So the disease is spread by spreading feces, not nudity per se, which is what i said. A clean nude person is not spreading feces simply by sitting." Your anus and most of your crack is never free from fecal bacteria, unless you soak in bleach routinely, so sorry, I don't buy your argument. "The argument from authority is NOT necessarily false. Or, if it is, then is everything you think about global warming, for example, false, because you only know what some authorities have said? Or are you personally a scholar on the matter? See what I mean?" This is a mischaracterization of how we accept "credible" information. It is NOT derived from the authority, but from methodology, replicability, consensus of data, etc.
If you want to understand Leftism -- and everyone needs to because it has been the most dynamic religion of the last one hundred years -- one good place to start is with San Francisco.

Or perhaps more precisely -- with nudity.

And even more precisely -- with public nudity.

Last month, the San Francisco Board of Supervisors voted by the barest (pun not intended) margin -- 6 to 5 -- to ban public nudity. By public nudity, the law refers only to displaying one's genitals in public. San Francisco women are still free to walk around topless. But that is not unique...

Related Tags: San Francisco Nudity