Ken wrote: "A vote for a third-party candidate is a vote for Obama."
Lets see how that works:
if 1000 people vote for Romney, then R = 1000
if 1000 people vote for Obama, then O = 1000
if 10 people vote for Johnson, then J = 10, but R & O stay the 1000
if 10 people don't vote, then R & O stay 1000 and J stays 10
Nope, voting 3rd party or not voting is NOT a vote for Obama.
President Obama tanked in the last debate. Good.
Now maybe people will listen when Mitt Romney says things like, "The genius of America is the free enterprise system, and freedom, and the fact that people can go out there and start a business. ... The private market and individual responsibility always work best."
They do.
But then Romney responded to Obama by essentially saying: I want big government, too!
We who hope for smaller government as a way to expand liberty and create prosperity are disturbed by what we heard last week. The GOP candidate painted himself as a big...
Incomplete reasoning is like mental vomit. You released a thought before you'd digested the info.
You've got a brain. USE it. To overlook the possibility that people are actually dithering between voting for Johnson or voting for Romney is beyond stupid. Those people exist, and you know it.
When it comes to throwing away votes that was done in the primaries when all these GOPhers voted for the establishment/internationalist candidates who mean business as usual. I reckon they either approve of this or they enjoy being lied to.
Romney probably is a good man when it comes to his own family but to me he is a rotten man when I consider his record and words. You're right, for these people He is the GOP version of hope and change and nothing will change save one. He will be worse than Obama if elected.
"When it comes to throwing away votes that was done in the primaries when all these GOPhers voted for the establishment/internationalist candidates who mean business as usual. I reckon they either approve of this or they enjoy being lied to. "