In response to:

Why Bill O'Reilly is Wrong About The Bible

natch Wrote: Apr 07, 2013 11:41 AM
You did a much better job of defining what O'Reilly did in defining his position than he did for himself. Very good.
Tommy_Maq Wrote: Apr 07, 2013 3:15 PM
I did read the column, and Bill makes precisely that distinction; it's about THE LAW, it's not about WHO IS HEARING THE ARGUMENT.

If you had a good reason to think I was wrong, you should have presented it...assuming you wanted to communicate effectively or be at all persuasive.
Baby Karl Wrote: Apr 07, 2013 3:00 PM
No he/she didn't... And you're as misinformed as they... Read the damn column!
Tommy_Maq Wrote: Apr 07, 2013 12:02 PM
That isn't what he said.

O'Reilly was making a point about the context of the argument, not the audience; when talking public policy, mythical texts simply aren't good enough.

For the last two weeks Bill O'Reilly has committed multiple journalistic mis-steps.

As long as he is allowed to define the terms of the narrative of what happened they will not be corrected. His failure to do so is a massive public relations problem and a mis-step in itself.

He owes a significant demo of his viewership an apology. He owes them one quickly so that his previously demonstrable prejudice against people of faith does not cause unintended long term effects.

"The compelling argument is on the side of homosexuals,” O’Reilly said on his evening broadcast March 26, 2013. “The...