1 - 10 Next
In response to:

Endangered: The Constitution Part 5

NataliaBur Wrote: Apr 21, 2013 1:30 AM
Just like the Bible, you freeking idiots like to pick and choose your interpretations. Of course, anything that the Constitution might say that doesn't suit your particular agenda is ignored. Asswanker.
Well, it kind of sounds like they listen to Alex Jones and Fux News, donut? I mean, if you want to claim something is a wild conspiracy and blow smoke out of yerass, then the place to get your material is Fux News and the rightwing hellhounds.
Wait.....din't FuxNews say it was Zooey Deschanel who was the terror suspect? I'm surprised that y'all aren't going after her with pitchforks right now, the way you assdopes believe every single gak that crappy network spews, even in gross, amateur-hour error.
In response to:

A New Era of Terror?

NataliaBur Wrote: Apr 17, 2013 11:03 AM
Well, that's quite a stretch, Carol. Axelrod was making the greater point speculating that the President was probably thinking WE JUST DON'T KNOW YET WHO DID IT, and listing a few other reasons that might pertain to the reason behind the bombing. You might want to remember that the President DID NOT jump the shark, as did Alex Jones and others in the rightwing who are SO DESPERATE to implicate anyone, anything besides the wingnut terrorists you house under your narrow-minded, hateful tent.
In response to:

A New Era of Terror?

NataliaBur Wrote: Apr 17, 2013 11:02 AM
Well, that's quite a stretch, Carol. Axelrod was making the greater point speculating that the President was probably thinking WE JUST DON'T KNOW YET WHO DID IT, and listing a few other reasons that might pertain to the reason behind the bombing. You might want to remember that the President DID NOT jump the shark, as did Alex Jones and others in the rightwing who are SO DESPERATE to implicate anyone, anything besides the wingnut terrorists you house under your narrow-minded, hateful tent.
Only if "Sean Penn" is the pseudonym of some crazed rightwingnut.
Classic example of what Wingnut Barbie's job on this shill cite really is.
Imagine that! The gang or Rethuglican't idiots that spent half a year rending their garments and howling about the victims of Benghazi couldn't even stand to give the victims of Sandy Hook an up or down vote. That is, until it became clear that continuing to stand on the side of political shenanigans while the families brought their pain to the disgraceful Senator's doorstep was going to ruin them in the next election. Finally, political self-interest pointed these boobs in the right direction. How proud you must be of your nincompoops in teh GOP.
WOW! You guys even PROMOTE the idea of being the Party of Doing Nothing! How peculiar. The same dopes who shot clots to their brains over Benghazi (even though SO many more Americans died in similar attacks during the Bush years......*crickets*) were against giving the families and victims of Newtown tragedy an up or down vote. What a moronic bunch.
Rending garments and clutching your pearls again, Sparky? Still?? Time to go back to the vapors couch until you get over the fact that you lost that particular issue months ago, Bucky.
1 - 10 Next
Thursday, June 20 | 04:22 AM ET
Thursday, June 20 | 04:22 AM ET
Thursday, June 20 | 04:22 AM ET
Thursday, June 20 | 04:22 AM ET