Previous 11 - 20 Next
Steve1579 Wrote:1 hour ago (2:03 PM) Or salute the flag...and when he does, use the left hand. ****************************** Have you ever seen Eric Holder take an oath? He positions his hand just like The gesture used to accompany the command "Stay " to your dog. It clearly shows his arrogance and disdain of the process of swearing to tell the truth!
THREAD WINNER!!!! And the "Christian" in the White House believes in collective salvation...a concept that would stun most theologians. But it fits nicely with his inability to recognize or accept personal responsibility.
Can you source that? I keep seeing different versions.
getthelibsout Wrote:40 minutes ago (3:08 PM) just wait til the homos and moozies(they ain't too hip to gayness) meet up...bring popcorn, gonna be a blockbuster ************************************* Muslims are true homophobes. But they side-step their little proclivities neatly. First, they deny that a Muslim can be gay...then they dismiss the acts of those doing the penetrating as "not gay." Their special devotion to young boys is also justified by having them dress in feminine dancing girl get ups. Thus, these men are OBVIOUSLY not gay pedophiles! See how that works? It's easy. Nancy Pelosi thinks late term abortions constitute "sacred ground." And we all know what a devoted Catholic she is...
In response to:

Janet Napolitano Forgot We Know About NSA

Nana82 Wrote: Jun 22, 2013 4:07 PM
Two thumbs up! :-)
In response to:

No Government Food Surveillance

Nana82 Wrote: Jun 19, 2013 4:59 PM
And Libertarians should wear name tags.
In response to:

No Government Food Surveillance

Nana82 Wrote: Jun 19, 2013 4:49 PM
We can have a discussion without the "you people" attitude. Do you object that your school taxes don't allow you to choose which teacher your kid gets? That your auto insurance won't pay for changing the color of your car or upgrading your wheels when they wear out? Or your med benefits won't pay for running shoes and a cute new nose? This is common sense and doesn't require a new dept. if you want no control over how your welfare tax dollars are spent just hand out cash.
In response to:

No Government Food Surveillance

Nana82 Wrote: Jun 19, 2013 4:42 PM
Perfectly said.
In response to:

No Government Food Surveillance

Nana82 Wrote: Jun 19, 2013 4:41 PM
You don't need to bother yourself about what people call themselves. Food stamp programs have always been limited in what products are allowed. Stupid EBT card just made it easier to buy unnecessary things. I don't want my money paying for stuff that doesn't contribute to health. When they earn money, they may have Gummy Bears 3 meals a day. They are on Welfare because they are unable to provide necessities for themselves. In our generosity we agree to buy them those necessities. That's a simple concept. There's no need for a food surveillance program. Just draw up a list of acceptable items to be allowed and be done with it. The WIC program allowed bread, milk, diapers, etc. it did not allow twinkies. What's the need for another dumbAS$ program. Your medical insurance won't pay for face lifts either. This should not alarm you Libertarians. But we can't allow another bureaucratic mess that collects information. We don't need to know what people put in their grocery carts (though we do have that data already) in order to administer a food "insurance" card that only buys non luxury, nutritious food. Why complicate things?
I seriously don't understand the concept of "bonuses" in government jobs. In private business bonuses are used as an incentive for profit. Government produces nothing. They make no profit. W T F?
Man John, I hope you're being facetious. That's how Libs think. Your politics suck so I can ignore the law! You should do a little research on Sharyl Attkisson. She BROKE Fast and Furious. Her tireless investigating spurred Congress.
Previous 11 - 20 Next