In response to:

Benghazi Baloney

mynana Wrote: Nov 07, 2012 6:02 PM
Connor if you think Benghazi is a piece of Baloney, I truely hope you will have to eat a piece of that kind of boloney.
Kiffur Wrote: Nov 07, 2012 8:17 PM
Had you read the article before you wrote your response, you would have understood that the "Benghazi baloney" referred to by Mr. Connor was the far from coherent response/explanation offered by the current administration - a sad let down indeed from the "transparent" and "non-partisan" leadership (and yes, I know, "leadership", of course, should also be delivered with air-quotes!) promised by then-candidate Obama in the 2008 campaign. What we have heard from POTUS and surrogates to date has amounted to (and thank you, VPOTUS for reinvigorating the word) "baloney", indeed.

The mystery surrounding the 9/11 terror attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi continues to deepen. One of the more recent revelations in the ever unfolding story about the attack involves the suspicious departure of General Carter Ham, commander of AFRICOM. Allegations have been made that as the general was mobilizing a rapid response force to come to the aid of the besieged consulate, he was told to stand down. (That siege, as we all know, resulted in the death of America's Libyan ambassador and three others, including two Navy Seals.) According to reports, General Ham told those telling him to...