In response to:

GOP: R.I.P.?

mulbery Wrote: Jan 29, 2013 9:08 AM
That's exactly the kind of trogylodyte thinking that loses elections. A republican push to bar people from voting unless they own real estate? That will kill your party real fast.
Neal from PA Wrote: Jan 29, 2013 10:27 AM


Not a fair comparison…Chris102 has made a very good point. The conflict of interest is very real and the freebies just keep on coming; that someone else is paying for.

mulbery Wrote: Jan 29, 2013 9:48 AM
How about if we can baptists from voting because they're going to vote to evangelize people from other religions? Its a conflict of interest, isn't it? Because jews and muslims and athiests are consitutionally gauranteed their right to practce their religion, or not, as the case may be.
Texas Chris Wrote: Jan 29, 2013 9:37 AM
What about disallowing welfare recipients from voting? I mean, if you earn a paycheck you HAVE skin in the game... But if Uncle Sam is paying your bills, you'll vote for more goodies. It's a conflict of interest.

Some political commentators are dancing on what they believe to be the grave of the Republican Party, claiming that the only way the GOP can have a viable future is for them to behave like Democrats.

Last weekend, National Review magazine sponsored a "conservative summit" in Washington. They should have held it elsewhere.

Prior to speaking at that event, Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal addressed the Republican National Committee's annual winter meeting in Charlotte, N.C., where he proposed a new strategy for Republicans and conservatives that begins, not in Washington, but at the state level.

Jindal said the Republican Party loses when...