When a Police Officer, sworn to defend the Law, PHYSICALLY OBSERVES a crime in progress, he has the OBLIGATION to pursue, and, if necessary, terminate the life of the perpetrator. Any defense of said Police Officer's actions should have already been recorded by required garb which should include BY LAW a video recorder. The termination of the life of the perpetrator should suffice to the general public to be a relief of threats of future crime from said perpetrator.

I HATE "Concealed Carry Laws". I HATE arms registration. I HATE **ANYTHING** that infringes in the SLIGHTEST on the Second Amendment. In the Old West, one purchased a firearm in the same manner as one would purchase a pair of boots. And, as a pair of boots, one WORE the firearm OPENLY, **NOT** concealed. The Second Amendment has suffered agregiously against already existing ILLEGAL LAWS. And, I am not just harping on the Second Amendment. The ENTIRE Bill Of Rights has illegal laws placed against it that need repealing to make the Original Bill Of Rights pure again.

And I say the gruesome truth is that the pro-aborts DELIBERATELY ignore true science. True science PROVES that once an egg becomes fertilized, that egg BECOMES an additional LIVING entity. If this entity is even PARTIALLY human, it should be considered FULLY human, and as such, FULLY entitled to ALL human rights. Regardless of what your personal beliefs may be, I believe True Science trumps ALL. From what I have seen so far, True Science has ALWAYS been in line with the Word of God, even when it seemed not to be so in times past.

If everyone packed a sidearm as in the Old West, things of this nature would NOT happen. I am not talking about the acceptance of "Concealed Carry", I am talking about OPEN CARRY, in which the sidearm is CLEARLY displayed. If EVERYONE who chose to carry a sidearm did so OPENLY, ANYWHERE, LEGALLY, the occurrences of mass murders would decrease DRAMATICALLY. The first armed teacher at Newtown would have dropped the murderer, possibly before the first innocent became a victim. And, who knows, a few armed teachers may have mitigated the tragedy at Columbine and others as well. Teachers have an increasingly hostile occupation. Why have they not already become ARMED?!?

It has been proposed that teachers be provided firearms and the training to handle those firearms. I am disappointed that such a suggestion has not been presented and implemented LONG before now. Why have we suffered such a tragic delay in something that is so essential?

First, they get our guns. Then, they get our Bibles. That's the Communist/Socialist/Nazi way.

I personally don't see the need for the possession and use of an assault weapon, BUT, out of FEAR of losing my OWN rights to the possession and use of a simple revolver, the ULTIMATE DEFENSE of our Second Amendment is essential to us all. Resgistration is Constitutionally Illegal, yet we tolerate it because we, at present, are hopelessly at odds against it. The Sad Part is, WE ALLOWED THIS TO HAPPEN!!! WE, as VOTERS, allowed THIS to happen by VOTE! WE fell ASLEEP! Now, we must VIGILANTLY remain AWAKE! We MUST return the Second Amendment back to what it originally WAS! This fight is more difficult as a result of our "Nap". We MUST correct this!

I suggest a more narrowly and locally defined definition of a "militia" would be a "police force". A "police force" is supposed to defend the general populace. Since it is humanly impossible for an official police officer to present an immediate opposition to a threat of violence, a remedy was proposed; the ULTIMATE defense would rely on the capabilities of the offended innocent. Whatever tools that may be available for self-defense SHOULD be legal in a court of law. I have a revolver. If I shoot someone under presumed threat and that culprit dies, I should be exhonerated by virtue of the fact that I defended myself. The status of my weapon should NEVER enter in to the fact that I was DEFENDING myself.. THIS is the ESSENCE of the 2nd Ad.

I doubt that I would ever vote for a woman to be President Of The United States Of America. That said, if some woman of Margaret Thatcher's caliber were to approach the candidacy, I would have some SERIOUS brain marble rearrangement to do. She had the brassy tack that few men can lay claim to. I maintain my stance against a woman candidate, with THIS proviso; if she can match or outshine Margaret Thatcher, I will enthusiastically vote for HER.

Moses married a Black Woman, and the occasion is recorded IN the Bible without report. Contrarily, homosexual interactions are condemned. The Bible has something to say about these events.

Sadly, this seems to be the course of present history. The Pope AND Protestant Ministers adhere to their interpretations of the Bible. They are UNITED in their opinions regarding Marriage and ProCreation. I have personal reservations against the Church Of Jesus Christ Of LatterDay Saints, but I discard those for now. Suffice it to say that the Mormons align themselves with the Pope and the Protestant Ministers when it comes to this issue. We ALL accept the King James Version of the Bible, which defines Marriage as a union between a Man and a Woman for the express purpose of producing a child. Such a union is IMPOSSIBLE in a homosexual union.