1 - 10 Next
In response to:

Adams 2016

MTglass Wrote: Dec 13, 2012 1:26 AM
I think he believes that "Any Justice who has ever written the phrase 'according to international law' in a legal opinion will be impeached. They were sworn to uphold our constitution. International law is irrelevant." is irrelevant.
In response to:

Adams 2016

MTglass Wrote: Dec 13, 2012 1:26 AM
I think he believes that "Any Justice who has ever written the phrase 'according to international law' in a legal opinion will be impeached. They were sworn to uphold our constitution. International law is irrelevant." is irrelevant.
In response to:

Adams 2016

MTglass Wrote: Dec 13, 2012 1:24 AM
I agree, I would not vote for Mr (Dr?) Adams. He is too liberal for me. If Homeland and TSA aren't top level offensives, if private and personal property aren't, if the right to vote and the promotion of a USA aren't; the candidate is the same as McCain, Romney, Bush(s), and Reagan. Sorry I would name more I'm sure, but that's where my memory starts; I don't mention Democrats as I can't believe the current got a single vote, and Clinton/Reagan are pretty early in my career. I'm sure these comments are in vain, as I doubt he has time to read them, but I wish someone would go through every Federal program and make modern sense of them.
In response to:

No Entitlements

MTglass Wrote: Dec 13, 2012 1:13 AM
There are also people who have lost their jobs, and chosen Medicaid for an operation to aid their child, rather than find a new job which will not fund the necessary operation. No it's not that they're dumb, it's not their color: it's the abundant spending of government which says "I'm from the government and I'm here to help." (PS. Reagan inclusive)
In response to:

No Entitlements

MTglass Wrote: Dec 13, 2012 1:08 AM
Great article Mr. Thomas, it certainly shows that there is no such thing as an entitlement: life is breath from birth to death. Those hours are best spent breathing and not waiting with shallow breath for the next entitlement paycheck.
Mr. Hanson, it's a spending problem, not a tax problem.
In response to:

Tax Rich Liberals

MTglass Wrote: Dec 13, 2012 12:59 AM
Republicans are all for extending tax cuts for all. It's Obama that refuses those budgets. So you're correct the blame belongs on Obama, not Coulter, but not the Republicans either which is where Miss Coulter wasn't precise.
In response to:

Tax Rich Liberals

MTglass Wrote: Dec 13, 2012 12:57 AM
Coulter is completely wrong. Republicans have submitted budgets that extend Bush era tax cuts for all. Obama rejects them, it's not the Republicans that are standing in the way.
In response to:

Tax Rich Liberals

MTglass Wrote: Dec 13, 2012 12:55 AM
As I'm sure you know, anyone can send any amount to the Feds. A tax isn't necessary, if those very wealthy feel that's the best use of their money, they can send it, it doesn't need to be a law. Of course they know that so why the push or a law? Hum...
In response to:

Tax Rich Liberals

MTglass Wrote: Dec 13, 2012 12:50 AM
It's not a tax problem, it's a spending problem. To solve the problem, IMHO of course, a simple 3 step plan is needed: 1) Cut federal spending across the board by 10% per year for the next 8 years. 2) Rollback the Fed's Charter to the Second Bank of the United States 3) Implement an Amendment that removes all ability to tax private property
1 - 10 Next
Saturday, May 25 | 06:20 PM ET
Saturday, May 25 | 06:20 PM ET
Saturday, May 25 | 06:20 PM ET
Saturday, May 25 | 06:20 PM ET