In response to:

Romney Was Not the Problem

msnider Wrote: Nov 23, 2012 4:48 PM
Had the GOP and the Rothschild, Soros, Goldman Sacks controlled media not shafted Ron Paul and Gary Johnson maybe we would have had someone that we all could have backed. Sorry but Romney was a major part of the problem. Now if we do not fight a revolution to take back our country and restore our constitution sadly our once great country is over.
DLWright Wrote: Nov 23, 2012 5:21 PM
Tinsldr2 Wrote: Nov 23, 2012 4:52 PM
Why? I certainly could not back Paul
Anonymous908 Wrote: Nov 23, 2012 5:14 PM
Maybe you couldn't. But there are plenty of Republicans, Democrats, Independents, 3rd party people, and people who have never been interested in politics before WHO WOULD vote for Ron Paul. My point is, that the liberty messege draws people from all walks of life, unlike Romney, Obama, McCain, etc.

This is why in head to head polls during the campaign, Ron Paul always beat Obama and Romney. His favorability ratings always surpassed both of them. So I wonder why it was his name would suddenly cease to be mentioned for weeks at a time on all media networks. It is almost as if the media is unbalanced or biased or something. Crazy idea I know.
Origanalist Again Wrote: Nov 23, 2012 5:18 PM
That's subversive talk Anon, reported.

Small minds always leap to the answers given the last time around, which is probably why Maxine Waters keeps getting re-elected. But the last time is not necessarily the same as this time. A terrorist attack is not the same as the Cold War, a war in Afghanistan is not the same as a war in Iraq, and Mitt Romney is not the same as John McCain or Bob Dole.

But since the election, many conservatives seem to be coalescing around the explanation for our defeat given by Jenny Beth Martin of the Tea Party Patriots, who said: "What we...