1 - 10 Next
In response to:

An Ominous Sign for Obama

MRFD Wrote: Dec 08, 2009 10:54 PM
@Saint Nick

Actually, the anger the Black Far Left has for Obama has been building for months. Conyers simply is the first well-known Black person to express it.

The first problem occurred in January when Boondocks cartoonist Aaron McGruder (a frequent George W. Bush critic) declared that Obama would be a disappointment by liberal standards:

http://www.dallasblack.com/entertainment/boondockscreatorob amanotblack

Naturally, McGruder was lambasted for "selling out," but he stuck with his original point.

More recently, the Black anti-war group, Black is Back, rallied in from of the White House while...
In response to:

Carrie Prejean...Yawn

MRFD Wrote: Sep 22, 2009 11:32 AM
Eugene,

It was a massive surge in Black DEMOCRATS whose votes got Prop. 8 passed:

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2008/nov/18/a-marriage- mandate/

Put another way, Prop. 8 would have failed if a White person (e.g., Hillary Clinton) had the Democrat candidate for President.

So, could you please put this "vast right wing, White, anti-gay conspiracy" lie to rest?
I wonder is Olasky finds recent events amusing. He prayed for God to change the heart of a Senator. It didn't occur to him the God would pull that off by removing a liberal (Kennedy) and replacing him with a conservative (Brown).

God's ways truly are not our ways.
In response to:

Frank Lombard’s Wish List

MRFD Wrote: Jul 06, 2009 1:19 AM
Will,

You've been complaining about how homosexual couples' feeling will be hurt if they can't adopt kids. However, you've shown not ONE shred of compassion for Lombard's victim.

Your actions echo those of the MSM as explained by Mike Adams [emphasis]:

"The main stream media is finally discussing the sexual preferences of Frank Lombard - the Duke University administrator accused of molesting and offering his five-year-old adopted son for sex, via the internet. Naturally, the newspapers are focusing on threats to the gay adoption movement not threats to those who are ADOPTED by gay parents."

And people like Will are actually baffled why so many Black Democrats think "White gay man = racist child rapist in...
From S. 909 it states that hate crimes are:

"2) OFFENSES INVOLVING ACTUAL OR PERCEIVED RELIGION, NATIONAL ORIGIN, GENDER, SEXUAL ORIENTATION, GENDER IDENTITY, OR DISABILITY"

So, what is sexual orientation, which is not clearly defined in the above excerpt?

Religion is pretty broad category, encompassing everything from Christianity to New Age. So, does that mean that the vague term "sexual orientation" could include crimes like pedophilia (i.e., rape of defenseless children)?
Read this excerpt from this commentary on "Pink Swastika," which explores the pro-homosexual nature of the Nazi Party:

[Hitler's Brown Shirts, the dreaded SA, better known as "Storm Troopers," were the creation of another homosexual, Gerhard Rossbach, and Storm Troopers were almost exclusively homosexual. They also, sadly, comprised most of the leadership of the Hitler Youth, resulting in frequent instances of sexual molestation.

The Brown Shirts were Hitler's enforcers. According to Nazi historian Louis Snyder, Roehm recruited homosexuals into the SA because Roehm felt Germany needed "a proud and arrogant lot who could brawl, carouse, smash windows, kill and slaughter for the hell of it. Straights, in (Roehm's) eyes, were...
Read this excerpt from this commentary on "Pink Swastika," which explores the pro-homosexual nature of the Nazi Party:

[Hitler's Brown Shirts, the dreaded SA, better known as "Storm Troopers," were the creation of another homosexual, Gerhard Rossbach, and Storm Troopers were almost exclusively homosexual. They also, sadly, comprised most of the leadership of the Hitler Youth, resulting in frequent instances of sexual molestation.

The Brown Shirts were Hitler's enforcers. According to Nazi historian Louis Snyder, Roehm recruited homosexuals into the SA because Roehm felt Germany needed "a proud and arrogant lot who could brawl, carouse, smash windows, kill and slaughter for the hell of it. Straights, in (Roehm's) eyes, were...
Will,

Recently, a story broke about a homosexual Duke University Professor, Frank Lombard, who raped his 5-year old Black adopted son:

http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2009/06/media_nervous_o n_new_duke_u_ra.html

Here are my questions:

*Why haven't pro-homosexual groups like GLAAD publicly decried Prof. Lombard?

*Doesn't GLAAD's silence reinforce the view among many Black Democrats that "White gay man = rapist of helpless Black boys"?

Just something to think about.
In response to:

The Advocate of the Episcopal Church

MRFD Wrote: Jul 02, 2009 10:01 AM
Christians change cultures by spreading the gospel, living it out, and standing against evil. For example, slavery ended because abolitionists Christians like Frederick Douglas and William Wilberforce challenged the sinful status quo. (Contrast this to Muslim countries where slavery is still prevalent.)

I'll close with a quote by Martin Luther King, who condemned churches that silently condoned the evil (e.g., Jim Crow) instead of opposing it:

"Things are different now. So often the contemporary church is a weak, ineffectual voice with an uncertain sound. So often it is an archdefender of the status quo. Far from being disturbed by the presence of the church, the power structure of the average community is consoled by...
Homosexual activists think DADT's end will be a major win. Maybe not.

Check this out:

1. DADT is repealed, resulting in open homosexuality in the ranks.

2. USA goes to war with a Muslim country that enjoys gruesomely killing homosexuals:

http://rpc.blogrolling.com/redirect.php?r=bd7495acefefde69e 71d0d2bfe4d758e&url=http%3A%2F%2Fbarenakedislam.wordpress.c om%2F

http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/269565

http://www.thenational.ae/article/20090503/FOREIGN/70502984 7/1002

3. Homosexual soldiers restrain their behavior or leave the service to stay alive.

4. DADT is unofficially restored.

As the saying goes, be careful what you wish for.
1 - 10 Next