In response to:

Rape, God, Life and Liberals

Mourdock's meaning was perfectly clear. The only way to change that meaning was to willfully and intentionally distort it. Its time to stop apologizing for left-libs' intentional distortions and start laughing at their stupidity in being unable to comprehend simple English.
Terminus in WA Wrote: Oct 26, 2012 10:40 AM
And they did. From just the headlines I had read, I assumed "uh-oh, there goes a real nitwit." Full comments in context reveal a completely different intent.

Let's stipulate that people, and particularly politicians, can get into trouble by attempting to speak for God. But that's not the moral of the story regarding Indiana Senate candidate Richard Mourdock.

Responding to a question about abortion, Mourdock offered a grieved response -- his voice breaking a bit -- on the matter of which exceptions he favored. His Democratic opponent, Joe Donnelly, also pro-life, said that he would permit abortions in cases of rape, incest and to save the life of the mother. Mourdock said he had "struggled with it . . . for a long time," but had come...